Some checks failed
No response / noResponse (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Continuous releases (push) Has been cancelled
CI / test-dev (macos-latest) (push) Has been cancelled
CI / test-dev (ubuntu-latest) (push) Has been cancelled
CI / test-dev (windows-latest) (push) Has been cancelled
Maintenance / main (push) Has been cancelled
Scorecards supply-chain security / Scorecards analysis (push) Has been cancelled
CodeQL / Analyze (push) Has been cancelled
61 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
61 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
# About the lab
|
||
|
||
<p class="description">This package hosts the incubator components that are not yet ready to move to the core.</p>
|
||
|
||
The main difference between the lab and the core is how the components are versioned. Having a separate lab package allows us to release breaking changes when necessary while the core package follows a [slower-moving policy](https://mui.com/versions/#release-frequency).
|
||
|
||
As developers use and test the components and report issues, the maintainers learn more about shortcomings of the components: missing features, accessibility issues, bugs, API design, etc. The older and more used a component is, the less likely it is that new issues will be found and subsequently need to introduce breaking changes.
|
||
|
||
For a component to be ready to move to the core, the following criteria are considered:
|
||
|
||
- It needs to be **used**. We use Google Analytics in the documentation (among other metrics) to evaluate the usage of each component. A lab component with low usage either means that it isn't fully working yet, or that there is low demand for it.
|
||
- It needs to match the **code quality** of the core components. It doesn't have to be perfect to be part of the core, but the component should be reliable enough that developers can depend on it.
|
||
- Each component needs **type definitions**. It is not currently required that a lab component is typed, but it would need to be typed to move to the core.
|
||
- Requires good **test coverage**. Some of the lab components don't currently have comprehensive tests.
|
||
- Can it be used as **leverage** to incentivize users to upgrade to the latest major release? The less fragmented the community is, the better.
|
||
- It needs to have a low probability of a **breaking change** in the short/medium future. For instance, if it needs a new feature that will likely require a breaking change, it may be preferable to delay its promotion to the core.
|
||
|
||
## Installation
|
||
|
||
To install and save in your `package.json` dependencies, run one of the following commands:
|
||
|
||
<!-- #npm-tag-reference -->
|
||
|
||
<codeblock storageKey="package-manager">
|
||
|
||
```bash npm
|
||
npm install @mui/lab @mui/material
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```bash pnpm
|
||
pnpm add @mui/lab @mui/material
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
```bash yarn
|
||
yarn add @mui/lab @mui/material
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
</codeblock>
|
||
|
||
Note that the lab has a peer dependency on the Material UI components.
|
||
|
||
## TypeScript
|
||
|
||
In order to benefit from the [CSS overrides](/material-ui/customization/theme-components/#theme-style-overrides) and [default prop customization](/material-ui/customization/theme-components/#theme-default-props) with the theme, TypeScript users need to import the following types. Internally, it uses [module augmentation](/material-ui/guides/typescript/#customization-of-theme) to extend the default theme structure with the extension components available in the lab.
|
||
|
||
```tsx
|
||
import type {} from '@mui/lab/themeAugmentation';
|
||
|
||
const theme = createTheme({
|
||
components: {
|
||
MuiTimeline: {
|
||
styleOverrides: {
|
||
root: {
|
||
backgroundColor: 'red',
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
});
|
||
```
|